友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!
读书室 返回本书目录 加入书签 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 『收藏到我的浏览器』

the.world.is.flat-第103部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完,想下次继续接着阅读,可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能!

products 。 。 。 Such a development would wipe trillions of dollars off the market value 
of technology companies listed in the United States; Japan and Europe。〃 Even if 
China's leaders; like former president Jiang Zemin; who was once minister of 
electronics; lose sight of how integrated China and Taiwan are in the world's computer 
supply chain; they need only ask their kids for an update。 Jiang Zemin's son; Jiang 
Mianheng; wrote Addison; 〃is a partner in a wafer fabrication project in Shanghai 


with Winston Wang of Taiwan's Grace T。H。W。 Group。〃 And it is not just Taiwanese。 
Hundreds of big American tech companies now have R & D operations in China; a war 
that disrupted them could 
424 
lead not only to the companies moving their plants elsewhere but also to a significant 
loss of R & D investment in China; which the Beijing government has been betting on 
to advance its development。 Such a war could also; depending on how it started; trigger 
a widespread American boycott of Chinese goods…if China were to snuff out the 
Taiwanese democracy…which would lead to serious economic turmoil inside China。 
The Dell Theory had its first real test in December 2004; when Taiwan held 
parliamentary elections。 President Chen Shui…bian's pro…independence Democratic 
Progressive Party was expected to win the legislative runoff over the main opposition 
Nationalist Party; which favored closer ties with Beijing。 Chen framed the election 
as a popular referendum on hisproposal to write anew constitution that would formally 
enshrine Taiwan's independence; ending the purposely ambiguous status quo。 Had Chen 
won and moved ahead on his agenda to make Taiwan its own motherland; as opposed to 
maintaining the status quo fiction that it is a province of the mainland; it could 
have led to a Chinese military assault on Taiwan。 Everyone in the region was holding 
his or her breath。 And what happened? Motherboards won over motherland。 A majority 
of Taiwanese voted against the pro…independence governing party legislative 
candidates; ensuring that the DPP would not have a majority in parliament。 I believe 
the message Taiwanese voters were sending was not that they never want Taiwan to be 
independent。 It was that they do not want to upset the status quo right now; which 
has been so beneficial to so many Taiwanese。 The voters seemed to understand clearly 
how interwoven they had become with the mainland; and they wisely opted to maintain 
their de facto independence rather than force de jure independence; which might have 
triggered a Chinese invasion and a very uncertain future。 
Warning: What I said when I put forth the McDonald's theory; I would repeat even more 
strenuously with the Dell Theory: It does not make wars obsolete。 And it does not 
guarantee that governments will not engage in wars of choice; even governments that 
are part of major supply chains。 To suggest so would be naive。 It guarantees only 
that governments whose countries are enmeshed in global supply chains will have 
425 
to think three times; not just twice; about engaging in anything but a war of 
self…defense。 And if they choose to go to war anyway; the price they will pay will 
be ten times higher than it was a decade ago and probably ten times higher than whatever 
the leaders of that country think。 It is one thing to lose your McDonald's。 It's quite 
another to fight a war that costs you your place in a twenty…first…century supply 
chain that may not come back around for a long time。 
While the biggest test case of the Dell Theory is China versus Taiwan; the fact is 
that the Dell Theory has already proved itself to some degree in the case of India 
and Pakistan; the context in which I first started to think about it。 I happened to 
be in India in 2002; when its just…in…time services supply chains ran into some very 
old…time geopolitics…and the supply chain won。 In the case of India and Pakistan; 


the Dell Theory was working on only one party…India…but it still had a major impact。 
India is to the world's knowledge and service supply chain what China and Taiwan are 
to the manufacturing ones。 By now readers ofthis book know all thehighlights: General 
Electric's biggest research center outside the United States is in Bangalore; with 
seventeen hundred Indian engineers; designers; and scientists。 The brain chips for 
many brand…name cell phones are designed in Bangalore。 Renting a car from Avis online? 
It's managed in Bangalore。 Tracing your lost luggage on Delta or British Airways is 
done from Bangalore; and the backroom accounting and computer maintenance for scores 
of global firms are done from Bangalore; Mumbai; Chennai; and other major Indian 
cities。 Here's what happened: On May 31; 2002; State Department spokesman Richard 
Boucher issued a travel advisory saying; 〃We urge American citizens currently in India 
to depart the country;〃 because the prospect of a nuclear exchange with Pakistan was 
becoming very real。 Both nations were massing troops on their borders; intelligence 
reports were suggesting that they both might be dusting off their nuclear warheads; 
and CNN was flashing images of people flooding out of India。 The global American firms 
that had moved their back rooms and R & D operations to Bangalore were deeply unnerved。 

〃I was actually surfing on the Web; and I saw a travel advisory come up on India on 
a Friday evening/' said Vivek Paul; president of Wipro; which manages backroom 
operations from India of many American multinationals。 〃As soon as I saw that; I said; 
'Oh my gosh; every customer that we have is going to have a million questions on this。' 
It was the Friday before a long weekend; so over the weekend we at Wipro developed 
a fail…safe business continuity plan for all of our customers。〃 While Wipro's 
customers were pleased to see how on top of things the company was; many of them were 
nevertheless rattled。 This was not in the plan when they decided to outsource 
mission…critical research and operations to India。 Said Paul; 〃I had a CIO from one 
of our big American clients send me an e…mail saying; 1 am now spending a lot of time 
looking for alternative sources to India。 I don't think you want me doing that; and 
I don't want to be doing it。' I immediately forwarded his message to the Indian 
ambassador in Washington and told him to get it to the right person。〃 Paul would not 
tell me what company it was; but I have confirmed through diplomatic sources that 
it was United Technologies。 And plenty of others; like American Express and General 
Electric; with back rooms in Bangalore; had to have been equally worried。 
For many global companies; 〃the main heart of their business is now supported here;〃 
said N。 Krishnakumar; president of MindTree; another leading Indian knowledge 
outsourcing firm based in Bangalore。 〃It can cause chaos if there is a disruption。〃 
While not trying to meddle in foreign affairs; he added; 〃What we explained to our 
government; through the Confederation of Indian Industry; is that providing a stable; 
predictable operating environment is now the key to India's development。〃 This was 
a real education for India's elderly leaders in New Delhi; who had not fully absorbed 
how critical India had become to the world's knowledge supply chain。 When you are 
managing vital backroom operations for American Express or General Electric or Avis; 
or are responsible for tracing all the lost luggage on British Airways or Delta; you 
cannot take a month; a week; or even aday off for war without causing major disruptions 


for those companies。 Once those companies have made a commitment to outsource business 
operations or research to India; they expect it to stay there。 That is a major 
commitment。 And if geopolitics 
427 
causes a serious disruption; they will leave; and they will not come back very easily。 
When you lose this kind of service trade; you can lose it for good。 
〃What ends up happening in the flat world you described;〃 explained Paul; 〃is that 
you have only one opportunity to make it right if something 'goes' wrong。 Because 
the disadvantage of being in a flat world is that despite all the nice engagements 
and stuff and the exit barriers that you have; every customer has multiple options; 
and so the sense of responsibility you have is not just out of a desire to do good 
by your customers; but also a desire for self…preservation。〃 
The Indian government got the message。 Was India's central place in the world's 
services supply chain the only factor in getting Prime Minister Vajpayee to tone down 
his rhetoric and step back from the brink? Of course not。 There were other factors; 
to be sure…most notably the deterrent effect of Pakistan's own nuclear arsenal。 But 
clearly; India's role in global services was an important additional source of 
restraint on its behavior; and it was taken into account by New Delhi。 〃I think it 
sobered a lot of people;〃 said Jerry Rao; who; as noted earlier; heads the Indian 
high…tech trade association。 〃We engaged very seriously; and we tried to make the 
point that this was very bad for Indian business。 It was very bad for the Indian 
economy 。 。 。
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!